Contracts written to be audited.

We work across EVM chains (Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum), Solana, and other L1/L2 ecosystems depending on your use case. Chain selection is part of our architecture phase — we weigh gas economics, ecosystem maturity, and your target users before recommending one.

Every contract gets an internal review pass, automated static analysis, and manual line-by-line inspection against known vulnerability classes (reentrancy, overflow, access control, oracle manipulation). For contracts holding significant value, we coordinate an independent third-party audit before mainnet.

Pricing depends on contract complexity, chain, and whether a third-party audit is required. A simple token or NFT contract with internal review can start in the low five figures; multi-contract protocols with external audits run higher. We scope and quote after the architecture call.

A single contract with internal audit typically takes 3–5 weeks. Multi-contract protocols with external audit coordination usually run 8–12 weeks, since third-party auditors have their own queue and remediation cycles.

It depends on the design you choose. We can build immutable contracts for maximum trust, or proxy/upgradeable patterns that let you patch logic later — each has trade-offs around trust assumptions and audit scope that we walk through during architecture.

We flag general regulatory considerations relevant to token design and jurisdiction as part of our tokenomics consulting, but we are not a law firm and this isn't legal advice. We recommend startups pair our technical work with qualified securities and crypto counsel in their target markets.

We profile gas usage during development, favor storage-efficient data structures, batch state writes, and benchmark against alternative implementations before finalizing. Gas optimization is reviewed again after the audit, since remediation fixes can change costs.

Every function ships with unit tests, and critical paths get fuzz and integration testing against a forked mainnet environment. We also run testnet deployments so your team can interact with the real contract before it goes live.

Yes — we build integrations with MetaMask, WalletConnect, and other major wallet providers, plus the listing and API requirements exchanges typically ask for. We also handle the front-end web3 connection layer if you need it.

We set up on-chain monitoring and alerting for unusual contract activity, and offer ongoing retainers for monitoring, upgrades, and incident response. We don't consider a deployment finished until it's actively watched.

Yes — tokenomics consulting is part of our offering. We model supply, distribution, vesting, and incentive mechanisms alongside your fundraising and product goals before any contract gets written.

Our monitoring retainer includes an incident response path — we triage, coordinate pausing or mitigation where the contract design allows it, and manage disclosure. This is exactly why we design upgrade paths and monitoring in from the start.

Standalone audit firms review code someone else wrote. We build the contracts, run our own internal audit, coordinate external review, and stay on for monitoring — one accountable team instead of a hand-off between vendors who've never met.

Start a project and we'll set up an architecture call within 24 hours to talk through your chain, contract requirements, and timeline, then follow up with a scoped proposal and quote.